Action to Prevent Sexual Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence: Resources for Practitioners (Short Measures). Durham, NH, USA: Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire.
African Women’s Development Fund. (2021). Generating knowledge and evidence on the prevention of violence against women. AWDF.
Bagwell-Gray, M. E., Messing, J. T., Ogbonnaya, I. N., & Brown, M. L. (2023). Definitions and Measurement of Family Violence and Aggression: Spotlight on Intimate Partner Violence. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), Violence in Families: Integrating Research into Practice (pp. 31-61). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31549-7_2
Banyard, V.L., Moynihan, M.M. Cares, A.C., and Warner, R. (2014). How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses. Psychology of Violence, 4(1), 101-115.
Bender, A. K. (2017). Ethics, methods, and measures in intimate partner violence research: the current state of the field. Violence Against Women, 23(11), 1382-1413.
Bradbury-Jones, C., Caxaj, B., Kanja, W., Kyemba Kulaba, M., Robinson-Edwards, N., Thomas, S., Weber, S. (2020). ENGAGE: Best practice guidelines in relation to gender-based violence research in low- and middle-income countries. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Campbell, R., Goodman-Williams, R., & Javorka, M. (2019). A trauma-informed approach to sexual violence research ethics and open science. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(23-24), 4765-4793.
Cieurz, C., and M.A. Keital. (1999). Ethics in qualitative research. In M. Kopala, & L. A. Suzuki (eds.) Using qualitative methods in psychology.
Cowles, K.V. (1988) Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. Western Journal of Nursing Research; 10(2): 163-179.
Denbow, C., & Watson, J. (2023). Feminist research on violence against women in humanitarian and development settings: A snapshot of best practices and challenges. Sexual Violence Research Initiative and COFEM.
Downes, J., Kelly, L., & Westmarland, N. (2014). Ethics in violence and abuse research – a positive empowerment approach. Sociological Research Online, 19(1), 1-13.
Ellsberg, Mary et al. (2001). Researching domestic violence against women: Methodological and ethical considerations. Studies in Family Planning, 32(1), March.
Ellsberg, Mary, and Lori Heise (2005). Researching Violence Against Women - A Practice Guide for Researchers and Activists. Washington, D.C.: WHO, PATH.
Fernández-Fontelo, A., Cabaña, A., Joe, H., Puig, P., & Moriña, D. (2019). Untangling serially dependent underreported count data for gender-based violence. Statistics in Medicine, 38(22), 4404-4422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8306
Global Women’s Institute. (2019). Ethical considerations for research and evaluation on ending violence against women and girls. Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Mary Ellsberg and Alina Potts).
Keddie, A. (2000). Research with Young Children: some ethical dilemmas. Journal of Educational Enquiry. 1(2), pp. 72-81.
Kelly, Adrian B., and W Kim. Halford. (2007). Responses to ethical challenges in conducting research with Australian adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, v. 59 no. 1 May: 24-33.
Kent, J. and Williamson, E. and Goodenough, T. and Ashcroft, R. (2002). Social science gets the ethics treatment. Sociological Research Online, 7(4). Retrieved February 24, 2006.
Logan, TK, Robert Walker, Lisa Shannon & Jennifer Cole (2008) Combining Ethical Considerations With Recruitment and Follow-Up Strategies for Partner Violence Victimization Research. Violence Against Women, 14(11): 1226-1251.
Mannell, J., Amaama, S. A., Boodoosingh, R., Brown, L., Calderon, M., Cowley-Malcolm, E., . . . Vergara, C. C. (2021). Decolonising violence against women research: a study design for co-developing violence prevention interventions with communities in low and middle income countries (LMICs). BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1147. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11172-2
Masson, J. (2004). The legal context. In Doing research with children and young people. (pp. 43 - 58). London: Sage.
McLoone-Richards, C. (ed.) (2023). Researching Domestic Abuse and Sexual Violence: Critical Perspectives for Student-practitioner Researchers: Taylor & Francis.
Introduction: Positioning the student perspective on doing research. Claire McLoone-Richards
Researching domestic abuse and sexual violence – ethical and methodological considerations. Holly Taylor-Dunn
Intersectional research narratives and reflections. Neelam Rose
Is it just a normal feature of their romantic relationships? Levels of acceptability towards adolescent digital dating abuse (DDA). Emma Jane Noble
The dynamics and perspectives of stalking and harassment behaviours. Malin Lunde Jensen
Why didn’t she fight back? An exploration of victim blaming through tonic immobility reactions to sexual violence. Sophie Heritage
The Criminal Injustice System: professional perspectives of Secondary-Victimisation in relation to female victims of male violence and abuse. Jade Jeffrey
Social workers’ responses to fleeing and leaving within the context of child protection and domestic abuse. Ayla Nasuh
The relationship between trauma recovery and statutory responses to safeguarding families affected by domestic abuse. Katharine Jones
A qualitative study exploring the experience of sleep deprivation as a means of coercive control in intimate relationships. Suzie Richards
The British Army and domestic abuse. Dave Aitken
Crime between the lines: policing coercive control. Sarah Pugh
Concluding Remarks: An editorial call to the novice researcher. Claire McLoone-Richards
Milling, Kinard E. (1996). Conducting research on child maltreatment: effect on researchers. Violence and Victims; 11(1): 65-69
Mortimer, S., Fileborn, B., & Henry, N. (2021). Beyond Formal Ethics Reviews: Reframing the Potential Harms of Sexual Violence Research. Australian Feminist Studies, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2021.1997138
Petillo, A. D., & Hlavka, H. R. (eds.). (2022). Researching Gender-Based Violence: Embodied and Intersectional Approaches. NYU Press.
Introduction: Recognition: Where Our Embodiment Entangled Us / April D. J. Petillo and Heather R. Hlavka
Part I Naming: Intersectional Entanglements and Embodied Experiences / April D. J. Petillo and Heather R. Hlavka
1 Embodied and Entangled: Addressing the Methodological Challenges of Feminist Gender Violence Research / April D. J. Petillo and Heather R. Hlavka
2 “Sometimes There Just Ain’t No Magic in This”: Black Women at the Nexus of Gendered Violence and Erasure / Brendane Tynes
3 Interwoven Violence: Gender-Based Violence, Haunting, and Violence Research in Milpa Alta, Mexico City / Catherine Whittaker
4 The Language of Dissent: A Conversation between a Researcher and Participant-Turned-Collaborator on Studying Domestic Violence / Dawn Moore and Stephanie Hofeller
Part II Being: Reflective Entanglements and (Academic) Violence by Another Name / April D. J. Petillo and Heather R. Hlavka
5 From Frontline Worker to Anthropologist: Shifting My Gaze on Intimate Partner Violence / Allison Bloom
6 “Can You Tell Me a Story?”: Speaking Alongside Anti-Trafficking Narratives / Corinne Schwarz
7 What Gets Lost: At the Intersection of Gender-Based Violence and Racist Scholarship of the Arab Gulf / Hasnaa Mokhtar
Part III Witnessing: Entanglements That Humanize Our Methodologies / April D. J. Petillo and Heather R. Hlavka
8 “Just a Darling Little Girl”: Attorneys, Power, and Notes from the Field in Research on Sexual Violence / Jamie L. Small
9 Trauma-Informed Research Methods: Understanding and Healing Embodied Violence / Noelle Brigden
10 Intersectionality in the Courts: Collaborative Feminist Ethnography of Sexual Assault Adjudication / Amber Joy Powell and others
Conclusion: Imagining: The Embrace of an Entangled, Embodied Methodological Future / April D. J. Petillo and Heather R. Hlavka
Prentice, K., and T. Signal. (2015). Engaged research in action: Informing sexual and domestic violence practice and prevention. In Madsen, W., Costigan, L, and McNicol, S. (Eds.). Community Resilience, Universities and Engaged Research for Today’s World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137481054.0007.
Safeguarding Research and Support Hub. (2021). How to consider language when researching sexual exploitation, abuse and sexual harassment. London: RSH.USAID. (2020). School-related gender-based violence measurement toolkit. USAID, Social Solutions International, IMPAQ International, RTI International, Dexis Consulting Group.