Ackerman, J. (2018). Assessing conflict tactics scale validity by examining intimate partner violence overreporting. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 207-217. doi:10.1037/vio0000112
Archer, John. (1999). Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scale: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), December, pp. 1263-1289.Ackerman, J. M. (2016). Over-reporting intimate partner violence in Australian survey research. British Journal of Criminology, 56(4), 646-667.
Ackerman, J. M. (2018). Assessing Conflict Tactics Scale validity by examining intimate partner violence overreporting. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 207.
Cascardi, M., & Muzyczyn, B. (2016). Concordant Responding on the Physical Assault/Abuse Subscales of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales 2 and Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychology of violence, 6(2), 303.
Cascardi, M., Blank, S., & Dodani, V. (2019). Comparison of the CADRI and CTS2 for measuring psychological and physical dating violence perpetration and victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(16), 3466-3491.
Chapman, H., & Gillespie, S. M. (2019). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): A review of the properties, reliability, and validity of the CTS2 as a measure of partner abuse in community and clinical samples. Aggression and violent behavior, 44, 27-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.006
DeKeseredy, Walter S., and Martin D. Schwartz. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. U.S. Department of Justice Violence Against Women Grants Office Electronic Resources (Refereed Publication) (https://vawnet.org/material/measuring-extent-woman-abuse-intimate-heterosexual-relationships-critique-conflict-tactics).
Jones, R. T., Browne, K., & Chou, S. (2017). A Critique of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales-2 (CTS-2). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 83-90.
Lehrner, A., & Allen, N. E. (2014). Construct Validity of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A Mixed-Method Investigation of Women’s Intimate Partner Violence. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 477-490. 10.1037/a0037404
Straus, M. A. (2016). Gender-violence, dyadic-violence, and dyadic concordance types: A conceptual and methodological alternative to Hamby (2016) that incorporates both the gendered and dyadic interaction aspects of violence to enhance research and the safety of women. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 336-346. doi:10.1037/a0039616
Straus, M.A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
Straus, M.A. (1990). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict (CT) Scales. In M.A. Straus and R.J. Gelles. (eds.). Physical Violence in American Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Straus, M.A., S.L. Hamby, and W.L. Warren. (2003). The Conflict Tactics Scales handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Straus, M.A., S.L. Hamby, S. Boney-McCoy, and D.B. Sugarman. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) - Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), pp. 283-316.